Understanding the Relative Strength of QBF CDCL Solvers and QBF Resolution

نویسندگان

چکیده

QBF solvers implementing the QCDCL paradigm are powerful algorithms that successfully tackle many computationally complex applications. However, our theoretical understanding of strength and limitations these is very limited. In this paper we suggest to formally model as proof systems. We define different policies can be used for decision heuristics unit propagation give rise a number sound complete systems (and hence new algorithms). With respect standard in practical solving, show corresponding system incomparable (via exponential separations) Q-resolution, classical resolution literature. This stark contrast propositional setting where CDCL known p-equivalent. raises question what formulas hard QCDCL, since Q-resolution lower bounds do not necessarily apply here. answer prove several including large class random QBFs. also introduce strengthening heuristic which does decide variables order prefix, but still allows learn asserting clauses. with policy, exponentially faster on some formulas. further exhibit p-equivalent Q-resolution. comparison version adapts both policies.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On Q-Resolution and CDCL QBF Solving

Q-resolution and its variations provide the underlying proof systems for the DPLL-based QBF solvers. While (long-distance) Q-resolution models a conflict driven clause learning (CDCL) QBF solver, it is not known whether the inverse is also true. This paper provides a negative answer to this question. This contrasts with SAT solving, where CDCL solvers have been shown to simulate resolution.

متن کامل

Report of the Third QBF Solvers Evaluation

This paper reports about the 2005 comparative evaluation of solvers for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs), the third in a series of non-competitive events established with the aim of assessing the advancements in the field of QBF reasoning and related research. We evaluated thirteen solvers on a test set of more than three thousands QBFs, selected from instances submitted to the evaluation and...

متن کامل

The Ninth QBF Solvers Evaluation - Preliminary Report

In this paper we report about the 2016 competitive evaluation of quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) solvers (QBFEVAL’16), the last in a series of events established with the aim of assessing the advancements in reasoning about QBFs. Aim of this preliminary report is to show at a glance design and results of QBFEVAL’16.

متن کامل

The Second QBF Solvers Comparative Evaluation

This paper reports about the 2004 comparative evaluation of solvers for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs), the second in a series of non-competitive events established with the aim of assessing the advancements in the field of QBF reasoning and related research. We evaluated sixteen solvers on a test set of about one thousand benchmarks, selected from instances submitted to the evaluation and ...

متن کامل

Challenges in the QBF Arena: the SAT'03 Evaluation of QBF Solvers

The implementation of effective reasoning tools for deciding the satisfiability of Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs) is an important issue in several research fields such as Formal Verification, Planning, and Reasoning about Knowledge. Several QBF solvers have been implemented in the last few years, most of them extending the well-known Davis, Putnam, Logemann, Loveland procedure (DPLL) for pr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Logical Methods in Computer Science

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1860-5974']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-19(2:2)2023